LIBS Info: Element Analysis

Title Authors Material Detector Spectrometer Software
Classical univariate calibration and partial least squares for quantitative analysis of brass samples by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy Jose Manuel Andrade, Gabriele Cristoforetti, S. Legnaioli, Giulia Lorenzetti, V. Palleschi, Abdallah A. Shaltout Brass Ocean Optics LIBS2500+ Ocean Optics LIBS2500+
Laser: Nd:YAG
Nonenm
50.0000mJ
1.000Hz
Gate Delay: 1.000us
Gate Width: 2100.000us
PLS is compared with standard Univariate Calibration in the analysis of brass. In this case, the justification is speed of development of calibration - good traditional calibration curves take much longer than PLS. For both analyses, the Cu figure was the difference between the sum of the other calculated concentrations and 100%. The conclusion is that while the CC gave better results on the unknown sample, the PLS gave acceptable results for the time invested.
Element Detection Limit (ppm) Wavelength (nm) Other Wavelengths (nm) Calibration Method Calibration Range (ppm) Notes


Element RMSE (ppm) Wavelength (nm) Calibration Method Notes
Cu 1.7000 % -10.0000 Univariate Calibration Cu determined by summing other elements and subtracting from 100%
Zn 0.5000 % 250.1990 Univariate Calibration
Pb 0.0010 % 405.7810 Univariate Calibration
Fe 0.0050 % 238.2040 Univariate Calibration
Cu 2.7000 % -10.0000 Partial Least Squares Partial Least Squares. Cu determined from summing other elements and subtracting from 100%
Zn 1.5000 % -10.0000 Partial Least Squares Partial Least Squares analysis
Pb 0.0140 % -10.0000 Partial Least Squares Partial Least Squares analysis
Sn 0.0400 % -10.0000 Partial Least Squares Partial Least Squares analysis
Fe 0.0140 % -10.0000 Partial Least Squares Partial Least Squares.