LIBS Info: Element Analysis
| Title | Authors | Material | Detector | Spectrometer | Software |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical evaluation of gated CCD detectors for laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy analysis | R. Heon, L. St-Onge | Aluminium Alloy | Andor iStar III | Jobin Yvon Triax 55 | |
| Laser: | Nd:YAG 1064.0000nm 60.0000mJ 2.000Hz |
||||
| Gate Delay: | 2.000us | ||||
| Gate Width: | 0.070us | ||||
| Paper compares the performance of an ICCD and Ocean Optics spectrometer/detection system. Paper compares the performance of an ICCD and Ocean Optics spectrometer/detection system. ICCD results are here for aluminium alloys, here for copper alloys , Ocean Optic are at here for aluminium alloys and here for copper alloys. Experiments were performed under common conditions, and then conditions optimised for each detector | |||||
| Element | Detection Limit (ppm) | Wavelength (nm) | Other Wavelengths (nm) | Calibration Method | Calibration Range (ppm) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Be | 0.1000 (Stated) | 313.0000 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | Average of 100 laser pulses: Optimised Conditions |
| Mg | 0.4000 (Stated) | 285.2100 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | Average of 100 laser pulse under optimised conditions. |
| Mg | 2.6000 (Stated) | 285.2100 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | 1 Shot under optimised conditions |
| Mg | 1.0000 (Stated) | 285.2100 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | Average of 100 shots: Common (good but not optimised) conditions |
| Mg | 6.1000 (Stated) | 285.2100 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | 1 shot: Common (good but not optimised) conditions |
| Be | 0.7000 (Stated) | 313.0000 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | 1 laser pulse: Optimised Conditions. |
| Cu | 1.0000 (Stated) | 324.7500 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | 100 Laser Pulses: Optimised Conditions. |
| Cu | 6.2000 (Stated) | 324.7500 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | 1 laser pulse: Optimised conditions |
| Cu | 5.5000 (Stated) | 324.7500 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | 100 Laser Pulses: Common (non optimised) Conditions |
| Cu | 33.4000 (Stated) | 324.7500 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | 1 laser pulse: Common (non optimised) conditions |
| Mn | 9.3000 (Stated) | 294.9000 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | Average of 100 shots: optmised conditions |
| Mn | 55.8000 (Stated) | 294.9000 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | 1 laser pulse: optimised conditions |
| Mn | 17.0000 (Stated) | 294.9000 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | Average of 100 shots: Common (good but not optimised) conditions |
| Mn | 102.3000 (Stated) | 294.9000 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | 1 laser pulse: Common (good but not optimised) conditions |
| Si | 8.2000 (Stated) | 288.1600 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | Average of 100 shots: optimised conditions |
| Si | 49.0000 (Stated) | 288.1600 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | 1 laser pulse: optimised conditions |
| Si | 23.1000 (Stated) | 288.1600 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | Average of 100 shots: Common (good but not optimised) conditions |
| Si | 138.7000 (Stated) | 288.1600 | N/A | Univariate Calibration | -10.0000--10.0000 | 1 laser pulse: Common (good but not optimised) conditions |
| Element | RMSE (ppm) | Wavelength (nm) | Calibration Method | Notes |
|---|