LIBS Info: Element Analysis
| Title | Authors | Material | Detector | Spectrometer | Software |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A semi-quantitative standard-less analysis method for laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy [Brass] | Pavel Yaroshchyk, Doug Body, Richard J.S. Morrison, Bruce L. Chadwick | Brass | Spectrolaser 1000 | Spectrolaser 1000 | Spectrolaser |
| Laser: | Nd:YAG 1064.0000nm 90.0000mJ 10.000Hz |
||||
| Gate Delay: | 1.000us | ||||
| Gate Width: | Noneus | ||||
| A different method for performing Calibration Free LIBS is outlined. In it, the spectra for the expected elements are generated, then key parameters are optimised to produce the best fit to the sample spectra. The aim is to produce a method that does not require operator skill to identify element peaks accurately. Comparison analysis is made on bauxite, brass/bronze, mineral samples and lab air. Bauxite samples were analysed in He. | |||||
| Element | Detection Limit (ppm) | Wavelength (nm) | Other Wavelengths (nm) | Calibration Method | Calibration Range (ppm) | Notes |
|---|
| Element | RMSE (ppm) | Wavelength (nm) | Calibration Method | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Si | 16000.0000 ppm | -10.0000 | CF LIBS | Note: Values estimated from paper (Figure 6) |
| Ni | 66000.0000 ppm | -10.0000 | CF LIBS | Note: Values estimated from paper (Figure 6) |
| Al | 70841.3721 ppm | -10.0000 | CF LIBS | Note: Values estimated from paper (Figure 6) |
| Mn | 9000.0000 ppm | -10.0000 | CF LIBS | Note: Values estimated from paper (Figure 6) |
| Fe | 13435.2149 ppm | -10.0000 | CF LIBS | Note: Values estimated from paper (Figure 6) |
| Zn | 20255.5107 ppm | -10.0000 | CF LIBS | Note: Values estimated from paper (Figure 6) |
| Cu | 40216.3790 ppm | -10.0000 | CF LIBS | Note: Values estimated from paper (Figure 6) |